The question isn't what you own. It's what you can prove.
The reality today is that most companies are running their IT decisions on data they've never properly tested. The Strategic ITAM Review takes what the company thinks it knows about its assets and checks it against what its systems can actually demonstrate. The output is one coherent baseline. Clear enough for the CIO, the CFO, and the CISO to act on without translating it four different ways.
WHY THE REVIEW EXISTS
Three things that break without a reliable asset baseline
Every company has some version of asset tracking. Very few have a single version of the truth. That gap creates real problems. Not theoretical ones.
THE CHLORIS CONSULTING GROUP ITAM REVIEW MODEL
Six dimensions. 87 questions. One complete picture.
We built the questionnaire on the Chloris Consulting group ITAM review Model, six interconnected dimensions that together determine whether IT asset management is working as a business discipline or just as an IT activity. The model covers 87 questions, structured across the dimensions where security, financial, ESG, and resilience obligations now sit in practice.
WHAT YOU RECEIVE
Two structured documents. One complete picture.
You receive two documents designed to move directly from analysis into decision-making. Together they give leadership a defensible baseline, a clear gap picture, and an actionable roadmap they can take to the CFO, CIO, or board.
What you get is a baseline, a gap picture, clear targets, and a path forward. Not four separate perspectives. One coherent package that leadership can act on without needing a translator.
HOW IT WORKS
Five steps. One coherent baseline.
One thing is certain, the review only holds its value if the work is done in sequence. Each step builds on the last. The questionnaire gives us what people believe. The data gives us what's actually there. The workshop resolves the gap. The reports make the picture usable. And if the company wants to carry it into execution, we stay for as long as we're needed, and no longer.
WHAT THE BASELINE MAKES POSSIBLE
Six teams. One question they can't answer without this.
The review produces a report. But the report isn't why companies do it. What the company gets is a single, verified picture of what it owns, what it can prove, and who's accountable for each part of it. That picture is what makes the six areas below workable. Without it, each of those tracks runs on assumptions. Compliance assumptions. Cost assumptions. Security assumptions. With it, they run on facts the company can actually stand behind.
Download the product paper
See how the 87-question Chloris Concept Model, data analysis, and half-day workshop translate into two structured deliverables: a comprehensive Findings Report and a prioritised Recommendations and Roadmap. The paper covers all six dimensions, explains why security, financial visibility, ESG, and resilience are now part of every ITAM assessment worth doing, and shows what the output looks like in language leadership can act on.